Loading course navigation
Loading lesson
50 min
Student Lesson
Lesson 22: Flex Research: Teacher-Curated Myth Source Set
Content
Students will develop research skills to answer a question about how different cultures explain one natural phenomenon through myth. Then they will gather relevant information from multiple sources, note source credibility, and draw evidence from sources to draft a synthesis claim.
Language
Students will use comparative transitions and attribution phrases to explain where sources agree, where they differ, and what those patterns reveal.
How do stories from different cultures explore danger, courage, or the unknown?
Knowledge-Building:
Students build on prior reading about Greek and world myths by researching how cultures explain weather, earthquakes, seasons, or celestial movement.
Enduring Understanding:
People across cultures use myths to explain the world, explore uncertainty, and express cultural beliefs.
Future Lessons:
Students will carry their synthesis claim and source list into the next lesson, where they will strengthen attribution and prepare to use this research in comparative explanatory writing.
Unit Performance Task:
Today’s synthesis claim gives students evidence and ideas they can use in the Shared Stories, Shared Lessons explanatory performance task.
| Lesson Flow | Purpose of Learning Experience |
|---|---|
Launch5 Minutes | Activate prior comparison work and help students choose a focused research direction connected to the unit’s essential question. |
Literacy Lab: Organizing Notes for Synthesis10 Minutes | Explicitly teach how to move from source-by-source notes to an idea-based synthesis claim. |
Learning in Action30 Minutes | Part A: Evaluate and Compare Sources (W.6.7, W.6.8) Students will gather notes from at least two sources and track where those sources agree or differ. Part B: Draft a Synthesis Claim with Support (W.6.9.a, W.6.7) Students will use evidence from at least two sources to draft and refine a two-sentence synthesis claim. |
Material List
Student copies of the teacher-curated source packet on myths explaining natural phenomena
Research Notes graphic organizer
Unit 4, Lesson 22 Student Edition
Teacher-curated source set of short myth retellings and reliable background articles about weather, earthquakes, seasons, and celestial movement from specifically named cultures, such as Greek, Māori, Inuit, Cherokee, Japanese, Chinese, and Nahua traditions
Routines
Think-Pair-Share
Partner Reading & Discussion
Turn-and-Talk
Have students take out their myth comparison notes from the previous lesson.
Teacher Guidance: Pair students with a nearby partner. Invite students to jot a phenomenon and a wonder or question in the margin of their notes before they speak.
Say these Directions: In the previous lesson, we compared myths from different cultures and noticed that many stories try to explain events people could not fully understand. Today we are turning that noticing into research by asking how two or more cultures explain the same natural phenomenon. This helps us gather evidence for the Shared Stories, Shared Lessons performance task.
Ask: Which natural phenomenon are you most interested in researching, and what is one question you already have about it?
I want to research earthquakes because I know some myths connect earthquakes to anger while others connect them to movement under the earth. One question I have is, “How do cultures use myths to explain earthquakes in different or similar ways?”
I want to research seasons because I already know the Greek story about Demeter and Persephone, and I want to find out whether another culture also explains seasons through a relationship or separation. One question I have is: “How do different cultures use myths to explain what causes the seasons to change?”
Say: Partner A, share first for 30 seconds. Partner B, listen for the phenomenon and the question. Then switch.
Connection to Today's Learning
Students have a topic in mind; next, they learn how researchers turn notes from multiple sources into one synthesis idea.
Teacher Tip |
|---|
This lesson asks students to research myths from multiple cultures, including some traditions that are still living and meaningful to people today. Frame myths as cultural stories and, in some cases, stories connected to religious traditions; studying them in ELA does not require students to adopt any belief system. Encourage students to name cultures specifically, such as Māori, Cherokee, Inuit, or Nahua, rather than using broad labels. |
The teacher-maintained model topic for this research sequence is how myths explain the movement of the sun and moon across the sky.
Display a small model chart showing how two sources can be evaluated and then used to develop a single idea instead of retold one at a time.
Model research question: How do myths explain the movement of the sun and moon? | ||
|---|---|---|
Source 1: Inuit source about Malina and Anningan | Note about Credibility: named educational publisher, informational purpose | Paraphrased Fact/Idea: The sun and moon move because two figures argue and one chases the other across the sky. |
Source 2: Greek source about Helios and Selene | Note about Credibility: museum or reference publisher, educational purpose | Paraphrased Fact/Idea: The sun and moon travel the sky through divine power and fixed paths. |
Summary of findings (evidence-supported claim): Both explain that powerful beings explain celestial movement. However, the details of who controls the sky and how they move are different. | ||
Say these Directions: Watch how I use research notes about my model topic. First, I do a quick source evaluation by asking who created each source and whether it was made to inform, not just entertain or sell something. Next, I corroborate by looking for overlap: both sources explain sky movement through powerful beings. Then I notice a difference: the details of who controls the sky and how they move are not the same. I should not write “Source 1 says this” and “Source 2 says that” as two separate summaries. Instead, I lead with the shared idea and then explain the important difference, which turns my notes into synthesis.
Ask: What is the strongest pattern or shared idea in the model notes?
The strongest pattern is that both cultures explain the movement of the sun and moon through supernatural beings. The details are different, but the big idea is the same.
Say: Now explain how synthesizing these two sources could help us make and strengthen a claim about how myths explain the movement of the sun and the moon.
Ask: How would synthesizing these two sources help make and strengthen a claim about how myths explain the movement of the sun and the moon?
The sources would support the claim: “Many myths explain sky movement by saying they are the actions of supernatural beings, though they have different ideas about who is in control and how these movements happen.” Together, the similarities and differences we observed would support the claim.
Check for Understanding (W.6.7, W.6.8, MSLS 1.2a, 2.2b-c) | |
|---|---|
Before you begin research, write one possible pattern of similarity or difference you think you may find. Use this frame if needed: “Across these myths, I may notice ___.”
| |
Modeling: | |
If students only restate their topic, prompt them to add what two sources might have in common or explain differently. |
Connection to Today's Learning
Students are ready to gather evidence and test whether their predicted pattern actually holds up across real sources.
Teacher Guidance: Students may work independently or with a same-topic partner. Each student must maintain their own notes.
Say these Directions: Choose one phenomenon: weather, earthquakes, seasons, or celestial movement. Read at least two sources from different cultures about that same phenomenon. Record at least one fact and one note about credibility for each source on your Research Notes organizer. Then use the “Summary of findings” section at the bottom to track one agreement and one difference.
SAMPLE COMPLETED ORGANIZER ENTRIES:
Model research question: How do cultures explain earthquakes? | ||
|---|---|---|
Source 1: source on Māori story of Rūaumoko | Note about Credibility: museum publisher, educational purpose | Paraphrased Fact/Idea: Earthquakes happen when Rūaumoko moves below the earth. |
Source 2: source on the Japanese Namazu legend | Note about Credibility: reference source with named author | Paraphrased Fact/Idea: A giant catfish beneath the islands thrashes and causes earthquakes. |
Summary of findings (evidence-supported claim): Both sources agree that a powerful force moving underground causes shaking, but they differ because in the second source, the force is an animal instead of a deity. | ||
Ask: What makes at least one of your sources credible enough to use in your research?
My source on the Māori story of Rūaumoko is credible because it comes from an educational publisher and clearly names the culture and the purpose of the article. It is trying to inform readers, and it gives specific details I can trace in my notes.
Ask: Where do your first two sources agree or differ in how they explain your phenomenon?
My two earthquake sources agree that shaking comes from something powerful under the earth. They differ because one source explains the movement through Rūaumoko, while the other explains it through the giant catfish Namazu.
While students work, circulate with Research Reflection prompts:
What new information did you learn today?
What new inquiry arose from today’s reading?
What changes do you need to make to your process?
Check for Understanding (W.6.8, MSLS 2.2b-c, 3.1h) | |
|---|---|
Add one additional source to your Research Notes organizer. Include the source title, who created it, and one paraphrased note in your own words.
| |
Modeling | |
If students copy wording from the source, prompt them to cover the text, say the idea aloud, and then rewrite it from memory in fresh language. |
Teacher Guidance: Students draft independently in their journals first. Then partners read claims aloud and offer one revision suggestion.
Say these Directions: A synthesis claim is a conclusion you can make after looking at both of your sources. First, you should look at the pattern you noticed across at least two sources. Next, consider an important difference or what that pattern reveals about how people explain the world. If I only write what Source A says and what Source B says, I am still summarizing. To synthesize, I need one sentence that leads with the idea, not the sources. Then I can add a second sentence that supports my claim and uses a word like however, unlike, or together to show the relationship between ideas. That is what turns research notes into a claim in my own voice.
Display the following writing model if needed for support and guidance:
Synthesis Claim: Multiple cultures have myths explaining the movement of the sun and moon as the work of two powerful supernatural beings, describing who controls their paths and why. Corroborated Support: In both the Inuit story of Malina and Anningan and the Greek story of Helios and Selene, the sun and moon are siblings that cross the sky. However, the Inuit myth shows a personal chase between the two figures, while the Greek myth imagines orderly paths guided by godly duty.
Say: Use at least two sources from your notes to draft a synthesis claim with one or two sentences of corroborated support in your journal. Name the shared pattern first. Then explain what helped you draw your conclusion about how people explain the natural world. When you finish, read your claim to your partner and listen for one suggestion about clarity, evidence, or synthesis.
Ask: What is your synthesis claim about how different cultures explain your phenomenon? What details corroborate your claim?
Across cultures, myths often explain patterns in nature, like the changing seasons as the result of powerful actions and emotions of supernatural figures. In both the Greek story of Demeter and my second seasonal source, the earth changes because a divine action affects nature. However, each culture gives a different reason for what causes the divine action.
The myths of several cultures explain earthquakes by saying they are caused by the sudden movement of a powerful force, which suggests that people used stories to make sudden and frightening natural events feel more understandable. In the stories about Rūaumoko and Namazu, the ground shakes because something moves below people’s feet, but the force behind that motion is imagined differently in each culture.
Scoring Rubric
Criterion | 1 — Developing | 2 — Approaching | 3 — Meets |
|---|---|---|---|
W.6.7, W.6.9 — Synthesizing evidence from multiple sources into a claim | The response names a topic or repeats information from one source only. | The response uses two sources but mostly summarizes them separately or leaves the relationship unclear. | The response states a clear synthesis claim, uses evidence from at least two sources, and explains an agreement, difference, or what the pattern reveals. |
W.6.8, MSLS 3.1h — Tracing ideas to sources responsibly | Notes or draft do not show where the idea came from. | Some source information is present, but it is incomplete or loosely connected to the claim. | The student’s notes clearly record source information, and the claim can be traced back to those sources. |
Ask: What is one helpful piece of feedback you can give your partner?
Your first sentence already shows the shared pattern, but your second one could make the difference clearer by naming how each culture explains the storm in a different way.
Pulse Check (W.6.9, MSLS 3.1h) |
|---|
Which student draft best shows synthesis across two sources? A. Source 1 is about Demeter and Persephone. Source 2 is about another season myth.
B. The Greek myth says seasons change because Persephone leaves, and I think that is interesting.
C. In both myths, seasons change because supernatural actions affect the earth, but each culture explains that change through its own characters and values.
D. Seasons are important in many places, and myths are old stories from long ago.
|
Say these Directions: In 2–3 sentences, answer both reflection questions: “What new information did you learn as a result of today’s research? What are your next steps for strengthening your source list or synthesis in the next lesson?” Include at least one specific source detail.
Ask: What new information did you learn today, and what will you do next?
I learned that different cultures can explain the same natural event in different ways, but they often share the idea that a powerful being causes the change. In my earthquake research, two sources connected shaking to something moving under the earth, even though one source used a deity and the other used an animal. My next step is to make my synthesis claim stronger by naming the cultures more clearly and checking that my source list is complete.
Say: Today you practiced one of the most important moves for the Shared Stories, Shared Lessons performance task: pulling evidence from more than one source and turning it into one clear idea. When you compare myths in your essay or seminar, you will need this exact skill so your thinking sounds connected instead of list-like. Keep your research notes and synthesis claim, because they will become part of your final explanation.
Ask: Which phrase or tool helped you synthesize instead of summarize?
The phrase “Across cultures” helped me start with the big idea instead of retelling one source and then the next one.
Say: When you can evaluate, compare, and synthesize sources, it gets easier to research in ELA, science, and history because you know how to turn a stack of facts into a clear explanation.
Bring your Research Notes organizer and synthesis claim to the next lesson. In your Journal, add one sentence answering this question: Which source currently feels strongest for your claim, and why?