50 min
Student Lesson
Lesson 14: A Raisin in the Sun, Argumentative Writing, Part 2
Content
Students will support a claim with relevant evidence and draft a conclusion that follows from the argument about housing discrimination and responsibility.
Language
Students will revise their argument drafts for formal style by replacing informal words and phrases with precise academic language.
How do our dreams shape who we are, and how do historical circumstances shape what becomes possible?
Knowledge-Building:
Students connect evidence from A Raisin in the Sun and the NPR article on racist housing policy.
Enduring Understanding:
Understanding how systems shape dreams helps students use evidence and voice to advocate for fairness.
Future Lessons:
Students will carry this full argument draft into later revisions and transfer these moves into Investigation 2 research writing.
Unit Performance Task:
Writing an argumentative essay prepares students for the Dreams, Systems & Change: A Research Argument,
| Lesson Flow | Purpose of Learning Experience |
|---|---|
Launch5 Minutes | Students will activate prior learning from Lesson 13 and set the purpose for concluding and polishing an argument draft. |
Literacy Lab10 Minutes | Students will learn what formal style sounds like in academic argument writing and how to revise informal language into precise, audience-appropriate language. |
Learning in Action30 Minutes | Part A: Drafting a Conclusion That Matters (W.7.1.e) Students will study and draft a conclusion paragraph that explains why their evidence matters. Part B: Revising for Formal Style (W.7.1.d) Students will revise their drafts by replacing informal language with formal, precise phrasing. |
Material List
Student copies of A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry
Unit 7.3 Lesson 14 Student Edition
Students’ argument drafts from Lesson 13
Routines
Turn-and-Talk
Language Study
Modeled Writing
Think-Pair-Share
Quick Write
Have students take out their argument and counterclaim drafts from Lesson 13. Use this routine to reconnect students to the counterclaim work from Lesson 13 and to frame today’s lesson as the final step toward a complete draft.
Say: In Lesson 13, we drafted counterclaims and rebuttals about how best to address the damage caused by redlining. Today, we are finishing that argument by writing a conclusion that explains why our evidence matters and by revising drafts to be more formal and precise. We are still answering our unit question about what happens when systems stand in the way of people’s dreams.
Say these Directions: Take a moment to review the following prompt, then turn to a partner to respond. Partner A, share first. Partner B, listen for one idea you want to build on. Then switch.
Ask: What is the purpose of a conclusion? What makes a strong conclusion?
A strong conclusion does not just copy the claim. It reminds the reader of the claim in new words and explains the bigger meaning of the evidence, like why housing discrimination matters for fairness and opportunity.
After one to two minutes, invite students to share their answers with the class.
Say: Now that you have named what a strong ending should do, you are ready to study how formal argument writing sounds, and how a conclusion can leave a reader thinking.
Teacher Tip |
|---|
Today’s lesson introduces formal style as a choice tied to audience and purpose, not as “better English.” As students revise, affirm that other languages, such as African American English and non-English languages, are valid, rule-governed language systems. Frame this work as code-shifting for an academic argument: Students are using formal English for a specific situation, not replacing their identities or language. |
Use this Language Study to help students hear the difference between informal and formal language before they revise their own drafts.
Display p. 91, and direct students to read Mama’s line, “She went out and she bought you a house!”
Say these Directions: Compare how two sentences use informal and formal language to analyze the same line of dialogue.
Target Sentence: MAMA: “She went out and she bought you a house!”
Sentence 1, Informal: Mama’s buying the house is a big deal because the system was really unfair to Black families. That’s why she sounds so excited and nervous.
Sentence 2, Formal: Mama's decision to buy the house is significant because housing systems had additional barriers for Black families. Overcoming these barriers makes Mama excited and nervous.
Say: Formal style is not about sounding fancy; it is about making the idea clearer and more exact for a reader. When I revise for formal style, I ask myself whether my words are specific, exact, and strong enough for my audience.
Ask: Which words in the formal version make the sentence sound more precise, and why?
The word significant and the phrase “additional barriers for Black families” make it sound more formal because they clearly name the problem. They are more specific than saying that something is a “big deal” or “really unfair.” The second sentence ties Mama’s excitement more precisely to the reason for it.
Ask: What differences do you notice between these two sentences?
Informal: The government should fix this because Black families got ripped off for a long time.
Formal: The government should help repair this harm because Black families were systematically overcharged and excluded from fair housing opportunities.
Ask: What changed between the informal and formal versions besides the length?
The formal version uses exact language to describe the kind of harm. Instead of saying families “got ripped off,” which is slang, it says they “were systematically overcharged and excluded,” which is specific and verifiable.
Teacher Tip |
|---|
Students may pronounce or structure words in varying ways in speech. When this happens, model the standard academic English form alongside the student’s phrasing without correction or judgment. For example, restate the word clearly (“government”) and draw attention to the morphemes (govern + -ment) to anchor spelling and meaning. Emphasize that pronunciation can vary across contexts, but academic writing requires consistent spelling patterns and standard forms |
Check for Understanding (W.7.4) |
|---|
Revise this sentence so it sounds formal and precise, and record your new sentence in your journal: The rules were messed up for Black families. |
Teacher Tip: |
If needed, remind students to replace vague words like rules and messed up with words that name the system and the harm exactly. Example: Redlining established unlawful practices that prevented Black families from home ownership. |
Connection to Today’s Learning
Say: You are now ready to use formal style in your own drafts as you write a conclusion and revise earlier sentences.
Students will first study a strong model conclusion, then draft their own conclusion using evidence from the play and article. Reserve enough time for students to have 5–10 minutes of writing time.
Say: A strong conclusion does three things.
First, it restates the claim in different words, not copying the introduction.
Next, it brings the evidence back together so the reader sees the bigger pattern.
Finally, it explains why the argument matters beyond one example by connecting it to fairness, dignity, and opportunity.
Say these Directions: Read the following conclusion and identify the purpose of each sentence: Does it restate the claim, show a pattern, or explain why the argument matters?
Model Conclusion:
“In the end, the government should help repair the damage caused by redlining because the harm was created by policies, not by individual failure. The NPR article shows that Black families were blocked from fair homeownership and often forced to pay more, and A Raisin in the Sun shows what that pressure looked like inside one family as Mama risks everything to buy a house. Together, these examples reveal that housing discrimination shaped safety, dignity, and wealth across generations. Repairing that damage matters because a fair chance at opportunity should not depend on race or neighborhood. When systems create inequality, communities and governments both have a responsibility to change them.”
Ask: How does this conclusion do more than repeat the thesis?
It connects the NPR article and the play, and then it explains that the issue matters because housing discrimination affected dignity and opportunity across generations.
Say these Directions: Use the model introduction, evidence and counterclaim-and-rebuttal draft to help draft a conclusion.
After you write a draft of your conclusion, use this Self-Assessment Checklist to review your conclusion:
☐ I restated my claim in different words from my introduction.
☐ I connected evidence from the article and/or the play back to my claim.
☐ I explained why the argument matters beyond one example.
My next step is: __________________________________
Students use partner feedback to identify casual or vague language, then revise at least three words or phrases in their own drafts. Reserve enough time for students to have 10 minutes of feedback and revision time, if possible.
Say these Directions: Read the following sentences. Which would you consider more casual, and which would you consider to be more formal or academic? Which words or phrases make that distinction clear?
Sentence 1: The government should fix this because Black families got ripped off and kept getting pushed around.
Sentence 2: The government should address this harm because Black families were economically exploited and systematically excluded from fair housing opportunities.
Say: I am not changing the writer’s idea here; I am changing the register. In other words, I am using language that is appropriate for the specific purpose and audience. I am making it sound less informal and more formal or academic. The revision replaces “got ripped off” with “were economically exploited” and replaces “kept getting pushed around” with “systematically excluded” so that the sentence becomes more precise and formal. Strong revision keeps the meaning but sharpens the language. This is how writers sound credible without losing the force of the argument.
Ask: What changed in the revised sentence (Sentence 2) besides the length?
The revised sentence uses exact academic language instead of casual phrases. It names the kind of harm more clearly by saying “economically exploited and systematically excluded.”
Say: Notice that the meaning isn’t changed in the revision. The revised sentence is changed to be more specific and to use academic, or formal, language. Your feedback and revisions today should have the same goals.
Say these Directions: Read your draft conclusion to yourself. Circle any words or phrases that sound casual, vague, or too much like everyday conversation. Work with your partner on how to make your language more formal and precise. When both you and your partner have had the chance to provide and receive feedback, revise one or more sentences in your draft.
Lesson 14 Writing Rubric: Argument Paragraph — Evidence & Conclusion
Writing prompt: Write an argument paragraph that supports a claim with relevant evidence and a strong concluding statement that explains why equitable opportunity matters. The conclusion should follow from the evidence, not just restate the claim.
Criteria | 1 — Beginning | 2 — Developing | 3 — Proficient |
|---|---|---|---|
Evidence & Analysis (W.7.1.b) Evidence That Builds the Argument | Evidence is absent or not connected to the claim. No analysis explains how the evidence supports the argument. | Evidence is present and relevant, but the analysis is brief or does not fully explain how each piece supports the argument for equitable opportunity. | Accurate, relevant evidence is integrated and analyzed. The explanation clearly shows how each piece of evidence supports the claim about how barriers shape people's opportunities. |
Style & Formal Tone (W.7.1.d) Formal Tone for Argument | Language is informal or conversational. The paragraph reads as a personal opinion rather than a reasoned argument. | Tone is mostly formal, but some informal phrasing or casual language appears in places. | Tone and style are consistently formal and appropriate for argument writing. Vocabulary is precise and demonstrates understanding of key terms related to opportunity, equity, and the specific barrier. |
Conclusion (W.7.1.e) Call to Action / Why It Matters | The paragraph does not include a concluding statement, or the conclusion simply restates the claim. | The conclusion follows from the evidence but is vague about why equitable opportunity matters. The 'so what' is implied but not stated. | The conclusion follows from the argument and explains specifically why equitable opportunity matters — not just for the people directly affected, but for the broader community or society. The closing makes the reader care. |
Checklist |
|---|
Directions: You will turn in your revisions. After you have finished your draft, check that you have:
|
Provide students with a confidence continuum (i.e., 1–5). As needed, model how to demonstrate a level of confidence using the continuum.
Reflection (W.7.1.d) |
|---|
Use the Reflection routine toReflect on your ability to revise your writing so that it maintains a formal, precise, and academic tone while keeping your original meaning clear |
Use the Quick Write to help students reflect on how conclusion writing and style revision strengthened their overall argument.
Say these Directions: Think about how your conclusion and style revisions improved your writing. Then write a short response that answers the following prompt.
Ask: What strengthened your writing today, and why?
Revising for formal style strengthened my writing because it made my ideas sound clearer and more serious. In my conclusion, I wrote, “Repairing that damage matters because a fair chance at opportunity should not depend on race or neighborhood.” I also changed “got ripped off” to “were economically exploited.” Those changes make my writing sound more precise and help the reader trust my reasoning.
Instruct students to complete their argument drafts. Students should check that they have completed the following:
A conclusion
At least three revisions for formal style
A Raisin in the Sun
Lorraine Hansberry

Black Americans and the Racist Architecture Of Homeownership
Ailsa Chang, Christopher Intagliata, Jonaki Mehta, NPR
