20 min
Student Lesson
Lesson 29: Comparing Red, White, and Whole and “Olympic Hopeful Works to Improve Bone Marrow Registries”
Content
Students will analyze how Rajani LaRocca develops Reha’s point of view across poems about Amma’s transplant search.
Language
Students will compare explanation and perspective using contrast language and precise academic vocabulary in discussion and writing.
Foundational Skills
Students will use context clues to determine the meaning of unfamiliar academic words in an informational text.
What is culture, and how does it shape our identity and sense of belonging especially when we move between more than one world?
Knowledge-Building:
Students connect the science of bone marrow donation to the novel’s symbolic use of blood, ancestry, and family ties.
Enduring Understanding:
Identity is shaped by biological, cultural, and emotional connections, and this lesson shows how those layers collide when Amma needs a donor match.
Future Lessons:
Students will carry forward today’s work on heroism, sacrifice, and perspective as they read the next poem cluster.
Unit Performance Task:
Students practice comparing what a text explains and what a poem reveals so they can later write stronger literary analysis about how a poem shows an important connection.
| Lesson Flow | Purpose of Learning Experience |
|---|---|
Launch5 Minutes | Students will activate prior thinking from the homework and frame the key turn in the unit: blood as both a family bond and an urgent biological need. |
Literacy Lab10 Minutes | Students will use context clues to determine the meaning of registry and ancestry so they can read the article with precision. |
Look Back5 Minutes | Formatively assess students’ ability to synthesize across literary and informational texts about blood, ancestry, and belonging. |
Material List
Red, White & Whole, pp. 160–174
Unit 4 Lesson 29 Student Edition
Venn Diagram graphic organizer
Routines
Think-Pair-Share
Introduce New Words Using Morphology
Quick Write
Have students take out their Journal and sit with an elbow partner. They’ll repeat the think-pair-share twice with their partner for each question and then share out to explain their thinking.
Say these Directions: In previous lessons, we practiced moving from a quote to an explanation of its effect. Today, we are using that same skill to track a major turn in the book. The turn we are analyzing is that blood is no longer only a symbol of family connection but also part of a medical crisis. Today’s lesson will allow us to consider how the author shifts meaning through symbolism.
Discuss the following questions with a partner:
Ask: Looking across your homework poems, where do you notice the biggest shift in the nature and significance of blood?
The biggest shift happens in “What Amma Needs Next” because blood stops feeling mostly symbolic and starts feeling urgent and medical. Earlier poems connect blood to family and fear, but here Amma needs a real donor match. That makes blood feel like both love and biology at the same time.
Prompt students to discuss the questions with a partner.
Ask: Why does “What Amma Needs Next” feel like a turning point in the novel’s theme about blood and belonging?
It feels like a turning point because the family realizes love alone cannot solve the problem. The poem shows that Amma needs a biological match. That match is connected to ethnic heritage, so blood becomes tied to both science and culture.
Connection to Today's Learning:
Say: Now that we have identified the key turn for blood as a symbol in the text, you will learn the vocabulary that helps explain why that turn matters biologically.
Teacher Tip |
|---|
This lesson includes serious medical content related to illness, donor searches, and transplant need. Keep the tone steady and factual, and remind students they may step out briefly or speak privately with you if the topic connects to personal family experiences. |
Target Words: registry, ancestry
Say these Directions: Before we read the article, we need two words that unlock its main idea: registry and ancestry. We are going to use context clues to help us determine the meaning of these words.
Introduce the Words: Present the words registry and ancestry using two sentences from the text-set-text. Display the sentences where all students can see them:
Target Sentences:
“A registry is a list of people who have signed up to see if they can donate marrow.”
“Because tissue markers are inherited, ancestry can affect a patient’s chance of finding a match.”
Say: When I read the word registry, I look at the words around it and notice a “list of people who have signed up,” and that tells me this word has something to do with an organized record. So my smart guess is that a registry is an official list.
Say: Then I read ancestry and notice the clue that the “tissue markers are inherited,” which tells me this word connects to family background passed down over time. That helps me infer that ancestry means the heritage or family line a person comes from.
Say: When I figure out both words, the article becomes much clearer because I can understand why finding a donor match is not only a medical issue but is also connected to family history and population groups.
Say these Directions: In your Personal Dictionary, write registry and ancestry. Find each word in the article, circle the clue words around it, and jot a smart-guess definition.
Then, check your definition using a print or digital dictionary, thesaurus, or other reference material, and record the part of speech and the precise definition. Reread the target sentences.
Ask: Does the definition fit the article’s context and match what we figured out? Revise as needed.
Check for Understanding (RI.7.4, L.7.4a) |
|---|
In your Personal Dictionary, write a final definition for either registry or ancestry and name one context clue that helped you determine the meaning. |
Connection to Today's Learning:
Say: Now that students know the key words, they are ready to compare what the article explains with what the poems reveal through Reha’s point of view.
.
Learning in Action (30 minutes)
Guide students in using a jigsaw structure to compare the article and poems.
Say: Everyone will read the article that explains donor matching. Model finding evidence for what the article explains and fill out that circle in the Venn diagram. Once that is complete, split the class into three groups and assign each of the groups one of the poems: “What Amma Needs Next,” “The Surprise,” and “Shock”. Students should fill in the Venn diagram for their poem. Ask each small group to share what their poems explain so the rest of the class can use their notes to fill in the rest of the Venn diagram.
Say these Directions: We will all read the article section that explains donor matching, and then we will read “What Amma Needs Next,” “The Surprise,” and “Shock” in our small groups. Use the Venn diagram to sort what only the poems reveal about bone marrow donations, what both texts reveal about the topic, and what only the article explains about the topic.
Completed Sample for Teacher Reference
Poems only | Both | Article only |
|---|---|---|
Reha’s fear, disbelief, and emotional shock | Finding a match is difficult and urgent. | A registry is a system for possible donors, and ancestry affects match rates. |
Say: When I compare a poem and an article, I do not ask which one is better. I ask what each kind of text is built to do.
Say: In “What Amma Needs Next,” LaRocca filters the moment through Reha, so I understand the fear, pressure, and unfairness of the situation from her point of view. In the article, I get a direct explanation about how a registry works and why ancestry affects someone’s chances of finding a donor.
Say: That means the article helps me understand the science and system, while the poems help me experience the human impact.
Say: When ideas are placed on the Venn diagram, they are sorted by purpose: explanation goes where the article teaches the reader facts, and point of view goes where the poems help the reader feel and interpret the moment. If an idea belongs in the middle, it has to be true in both texts.
Prompt students to respond to the questions after completing the Venn Diagram, respond to the questions.
Ask: What does the article clarify about bone marrow donation that the poems leave mostly unsaid?
The article clarifies how a donor registry works and why it can be harder to find a match if not enough people from the same ancestry are registered. The poems show the family’s stress, but the article explains the system behind that stress.
Ask: What does Reha’s point of view in the poems reveal that the article cannot capture in the same way?
Reha’s point of view reveals how shocking and personal the situation feels inside the family. In “Shock” and “The Surprise,” I can feel her confusion and fear, while the article stays more factual and distant. The poems feel more genuine and raw.
Pulse Check (RL.7.6, RI.7.4) |
|---|
Which statement best compares what the article and the poems contribute to the topic of Amma’s transplant search? A. Both texts mostly explain the medical steps of the transplant process in the same way.
B. The poems explain how donor registries work, while the article mainly shows Reha’s private fear.
C. The article explains how registries and ancestry affect finding a donor, while the poems show the family’s experience through Reha’s point of view.
D. The article proves that Amma’s relatives will definitely be able to donate because they share her ancestry.
|
Connection to Today's Learning:
Say: Now that you have discovered the purpose of each text and compared them in your notes, we’ll now turn that comparison into precise analytical sentences.
Pair students up to reflect with a partner before writing.
Say these Directions: With the same partner, rehearse two sentences before you write. Sentence 1 should explain what the article made you understand better about the poems, and Sentence 2 should explain what the poems made you feel that the article did not. Use registry or ancestry in at least one sentence, and cite at least one poem title as part of your evidence.
Say: A weak comparison sentence says something vague, like “the article helped me understand more.” A stronger sentence will name the exact idea the article clarified.
Say: For example, I might say, “the article helped me understand why ‘What Amma Needs Next’ becomes more urgent, because it explains how a registry works and why ancestry affects donor matches.”
Say: Then my second sentence should name the feeling or point of view the poems create, such as how “Shock” lets readers feel Reha’s fear from inside the moment. When I connect the two sentences, I am showing how different texts build different kinds of understanding.
Say: That is synthesis: not just listing two texts, but explaining how they work together.
Ask: Which article detail will you use in your first sentence, and how does it deepen your understanding of “What Amma Needs Next” or “Shock”?
I will use the detail that ancestry affects a patient's likelihood of finding a donor match. That deepens my understanding of “What Amma Needs Next” because it shows why the family’s search is not random and why the problem feels bigger than just one hospital visit.
Ask: Which poem moment will you use in your second sentence, and why does that feeling not appear the same way in the article?
I will use “Shock” because the title and Reha’s point of view make the news feel immediate and overwhelming. The article never conveys that same feeling because it stays focused on facts and explanations rather than on one girl’s private reaction. The poem makes it more emotional and meaningful.
Check for Understanding (RL.7.6, W.7.2.a W.7.2.b) |
|---|
Write your two final sentences. In the first sentence, include one idea from the article. In the second sentence, include one feeling or point-of-view detail from a poem. |
Provide students with a confidence continuum (i.e., 1–5). As needed, model how to demonstrate a level of confidence using the continuum.
Reflection (RL.7.6, W.7.2.a W.7.2.b) |
|---|
Use the Reflection routine to reflect on your ability to explain how the article deepens your understanding of the poems and how the poems add a feeling or point of view the article does not. |
Teacher Tip |
|---|
If students write vague sentences, prompt them to cite evidence and add a because clause that explains the connection. |
Connection to Today's Learning:
Say: We have now moved from discussion into written synthesis, which prepares us to do stronger cross-text thinking in future analysis.
Have students write a brief response using evidence from both texts to explain biological and cultural connections.
Say these Directions: Today we compared what a poem can show and what an article can explain. Write 2–3 sentences.
Ask: Did today’s reading deepen your understanding of blood as both a biological and cultural connection? Use one detail from the article and one detail from a poem in your response.
The article helped me understand that finding a bone marrow donor is connected to a registry and can depend on shared ancestry, which made the problem in “What Amma Needs Next” feel more specific and real. The poems, especially “Shock,” helped me feel how scary that reality is for Reha and her family. Together, the texts show that blood is not only about love and family bonds but also about biology and heritage.
Optional Sentence Starter:
The article clarified ___, but the poem revealed ___.
Instruct students to read “No One,” “But If,” “Hero,” “The Needle,” “Close Enough,” “Savitri, Part 4,” “The Story I Want to Tell,” and “Watching.” As they read, students should annotate for moments when heroism seems to shift from a big dramatic act to endurance, waiting, or care.
Ask students to respond to the following question in their Journal:
How does the idea of a hero begin to change throughout these poems?
Olympic Hopeful Works to Improve Bone Marrow Registries
Frederica Boswell, NPR
