50 min
Student Lesson
Lesson 18: Seen and Unseen, Discussion, Part 1
Content
Students will engage in a small-group Academic Discussion that considers each section of Seen and Unseen in turn, focusing on what it reveals about the extent and limitations of the records of Japanese American incarceration.
Language
Students will synthesize perspectives across Seen and Unseen and their primary sources by using accountable discussion moves (agree/build/clarify/challenge), comparative and synthesis connectors, and academic nouns (perspective, omission, visibility) to make evidence-based oral explanations that deepen their response to the Essential Question.
Foundational Skills
Students will practice participating in an accountable conversation that observes norms they have helped to decide and articulate.
How do historical records (texts, images, and testimony) shape what is remembered about the past?
Knowledge-Building:
The questions in this lesson’s discussion provide an opportunity to synthesize knowledge from across the past 17 lessons of reading, writing, and research.
Enduring Understanding:
Conscientious people can disagree about how to interpret primary and secondary sources in understanding a historic event.
Future Lessons:
In future lessons, students will choose their own portion of Seen and Unseen to annotate with a view to understanding craft choices made by the author and illustrator. There will also be available Flex lessons in case you need to adjust your pacing to provide additional student support.
Unit Performance Task:
Many of the “moves” students make in an accountable, evidence-based discussion will transfer to their projects and presentations at the end of the unit, which also rely on interpretation of historical evidence.
| Lesson Flow | Purpose of Learning Experience |
|---|---|
Launch5 Minutes | Students will prepare for a full-class discussion via a short turn-and-talk activity focused on the Essential Question. |
Literacy Lab10 Minutes | Students will establish norms and goals for this lesson’s discussion. |
Learning in Action30 Minutes | Part A: Model Discussion (RI.7.9, SL.7.1.a-d) Students will observe as the teacher models a round of group discussion following the Reflect-and-Respond Dialogue protocol. Part B: Group Discussion (RI.7.9, SL.7.1, SL.7.1.a–d, SL.7.4) Students will use the Reflect-and-Respond Dialogue to respond to questions about Seen and Unseen, their primary sources, and the unit’s Essential Question in a small-group discussion. |
Material List
Student copies of Seen and Unseen by Elizabeth Partridge and Lauren Tamaki
Unit 2 Lesson 18 Student Edition
Accountable Talk Sentence Stems graphic organizer
Reflect-and-Respond graphic organizer
Routines
Turn and Talk
Reflect-and-Respond Dialogue
Check for Understanding
Have students take out their copies of Seen and Unseen, along with their primary sources from the previous lesson:
Lesson 18 Homework: Students wrote in their Homework Journals about the information they wanted to share in the upcoming discussion and the connections they could draw to Seen and Unseen.
Instruct students to spend one to two minutes sharing what they wrote in their Homework Journals. What did they each think was important? Then instruct them to answer the following question using the turn-and-talk routine in order to prepare for today’s discussion.
Ask: How does Seen and Unseen help you respond to the Essential Question: “How do historical records—texts, images, and testimony—shape what is remembered about the past?”
Seen and Unseen shows how three different photographers tried to capture what was happening during the incarceration of Japanese Americans. Each photographer had their own perspective and limitations—in terms of what they were allowed to photograph, what kind of resources they had, or what their goals were in photographing the Manzanar internment camp. Together, they helped us remember a wide range of stories about the people at that camp. However, there are other incarceration sites that were less well-documented, and even at Manzanar many people did not have their personal stories included in the photos.
Say: In today’s group discussion, keep in mind the Essential Question. In order to answer it, we will start by looking at different details from the text in order to determine what is "seen and unseen” in the documentary evidence.
Lead students in determining norms that today’s group discussion will follow by reflecting on their own experiences of effective, respectful conversations. Explain as needed that norms are goals or expectations that we will do our best to meet. Write each norm on the board for students to see during the discussion.
Say: To have a successful discussion, it’s important to have clear norms about listening. Imagine you are having a conversation and you can tell the other person is really listening to what you have to say. What does that look and sound like?
eyes on speaker, quiet body, taking turns, waiting for a pause before responding
Say: Let’s sum this up in a clear statement so it’s easy to remember: We listen without interrupting.
Say: Our second norm should be about using evidence. In our writing in this unit, we have used evidence to support our claims. In this discussion, we will do the same.
Ask: What kinds of evidence have we explored in this unit, in Seen and Unseen as well as other texts and media?
a photograph, a written quotation, an official notice or document, a statement made in an interview
Say: Let’s write the norm: We base our comments on evidence. This can be textual or visual evidence. When you speak, try to say where in the text you are getting your evidence from. You can use a page number, a section, or a title like “One Nation Indivisible.”
Say: Finally, let’s set a norm about how we respond to one another. In a strong discussion, we respond to ideas, not to people. This is especially important when we disagree.
Ask: What are respectful ways to disagree or build on someone’s thinking?
“I agree because . . . ,” “I want to add . . . ,” “I see it differently because . . . ,” and “Can you clarify . . . ?”
Say: Let’s write the norm: We respond to ideas rather than individuals. We don’t label someone’s comment as “wrong”; we explain our thinking and evidence.
Connection to Today’s Learning
Say: Let’s keep these norms in mind as we discuss what we’ve read and understood in this unit so far. We’ll practice them as I lead us in a short example conversation, and we’ll use them independently in a longer discussion after that.
Provide students with the Accountable Talk Sentence Stems and Reflect and Respond graphic organizers to help them formulate their thoughts during the discussion.
Briefly explain the Reflect-and-Respond Dialogue protocol.
Say: Our discussion today will follow a model called Reflect-and-Respond. The point of this model is for us to reflect on the text and respond to one another’s observations. This way, we work together to understand the text instead of just sharing separate opinions. Here’s how the process works:
Select a quote, caption, panel moment, or idea from one of the texts that captured your attention.
Share it with a partner or group and briefly explain why it stood out.
Respond to each other’s reflections by building on an idea, asking a clarifying question, or offering another interpretation.
Then, return to the text to get a deeper understanding: “What evidence supports that?” “What detail might change how we see it?’”
Say: In our discussion today, you will work in groups of four, and each round will follow the same pattern:
I will ask and post the question.
You will get one to two minutes to reread, find evidence, and jot ideas.
One student begins as the presenter.
Each student has one minute to speak.
The final student has 30 seconds to synthesize the group’s thinking, naming one point of agreement and one new insight.
Say: To make sure everyone gets a chance to lead, the first and final speaker will rotate each round. That way, each person will lead once and end once.
Modeling a Discussion Round
Choose three students to join you in modeling a discussion round. Post the example question on the board: “How do Dorothea Lange’s photographs and the rules she had to follow affect what we can see and what remains hidden about life under incarceration?” Give students in the model group a minute to find one detail from a photo or text to support their responses before starting the model discussion.
Have Student 1 start as the presenter.
Lange’s photos from before incarceration show how dramatically life changed. I am thinking of the “One Nation Indivisible” photos from “Exposing Injustice,” which showed Japanese American kids in a regular public school right before they were sent to the camps.
Have Student 2 respond:
I agree, and her photos from Tanforan, like the ones on p. 37 of Seen and Unseen, show how those children were moved to cramped barracks in the middle of nowhere.
Have Student 3 respond:
That’s true, but Lange also had subjects she wasn’t allowed to photograph, like the guard towers and barbed wire. Those aspects of the camps would have remained hidden if others such as Toyo Miyatake hadn’t taken pictures of them.
Playing the role as the final speaker, model how to synthesize the group’s thinking:
Say: Hearing your points helps me understand that because she took photos before and during incarceration, Lange was able to capture a dramatic change for the worse in the lives of the prisoners. But she couldn’t capture some of the harshest aspects of camp life because she was watched by guards.
Teacher Tip |
|---|
Point out that during a real-time conversation, it might not be possible to remember the source of every piece of evidence that a speaker wants to use. Model the process of describing sources in enough detail that an interested listener could find them later. For example, “I don’t remember the exact page number, but one of Ansel Adams’s photos in Seen and Unseen showed a man in a field holding up cabbages.” Then discuss how a listener could use this description to identify the relevant section, page, and photo—for instance, by using the photo credit index at the back of the book. |
Provide students with a confidence continuum (i.e., 1–5). As needed, model how to demonstrate a level of confidence using the continuum.
Reflection |
|---|
Reflect on your ability to participate in a Reflect-and-Respond discussion using the Reflection routine. |
Reflect-and-Respond Dialogue
After assigning students to groups of four, launch the first discussion round by reading aloud and writing on the board the first of the discussion questions.
Ask: How does Toyo Miyatake’s perspective as a trusted community photographer influence the stories he documents? Whose experiences are made visible, and whose might be missing?
Once the first round is complete, continue with the second- and third-round (and, if time permits, fourth-round) preparatory questions.
Ask: How does Ansel Adams’s approach compare to that of Lange and Miyatake? What does his choice of subjects reveal or hide?
Ask: How does the information at the end of Seen and Unseen (pp. 106–123) help us understand what historians can and cannot know about life in the camps?
Ask: How did combining evidence from multiple sources (photographs, letters, oral histories, text) shape your understanding of what was “seen and unseen” during incarceration?
For the final discussion round, have students discuss the Essential Question.
Ask: What is one truth about Japanese American incarceration that became more visible to you during Investigation 1, and which sources helped reveal it?
Use the Unit 2 Academic Discussion 1 Scoring Rubric to assess students’ discussion performance.
Checklist |
|---|
As you engage in group discussion, remember to:
|
Unit 2 Academic Discussion 1 Scoring Rubric
| 1 – Developing | 2 – Approaching | 3 – Meets |
|---|---|---|---|
Preparation | Student did not review annotations and was not prepared for discussion. | Student reviewed some annotations and was partly prepared for discussion. | Student reviewed their annotations and was fully prepared for discussion. |
Listening | Student did not follow classroom norms for accountable discussions. | Student followed classroom norms for accountable discussions partially or inconsistently. | Student listened to all classmates and consistently followed accountable discussion norms. |
Speaking/ Contributions | Student did not contribute relevant ideas or evidence to the discussion. | Student contributed to the conversation in some rounds or contributed material of limited relevance. | Student contributed to the conversation every round with consistently relevant ideas and evidence. |
Language | Student’s comments are unclear or incomplete. Student uses vague words (“stuff,” “things”) that are left unexplained. Sentence structures may confuse meaning. | Student’s comments are mostly clear. Student sometimes uses academic language (e.g., reveals, emphasizes, suggests), but wording may be repetitive or imprecise. | Student’s comments are consistently clear and precise. Student makes fluent use of academic verbs and transition structures (e.g., therefore, as a result) and adjusts language to respond respectfully to peers’ ideas. |
Content Connections | Student makes mostly summary rather than explanatory statements. Connections to unit themes of visibility and representation are unclear or unsupported. | Student explains at least one meaningful idea about visibility and representation in the context of Japanese American incarceration. However, the idea may be vague or have weak evidentiary support. | Student explains a clear and well-supported idea about visibility and representation in the context of Japanese American incarceration. Student connects details and structure to support their idea. |
Have students write two to three sentences in response to the following prompt:
Ask: What is one new insight or observation you gained from today’s discussion?
Today’s discussion helped me understand that Toyo Miyatake’s photos recorded an important aspect of camp life because they showed how people adapted to the tough conditions of incarceration. By photographing celebrations and other personal moments, he showed that the prisoners were not just passive victims but people who actively sought to adapt to and improve their circumstances.
Seen and Unseen
Elizabeth Partridge & Lauren Tamaki
