50 min
Student Lesson
Lesson 18: Red, White and Whole, Argumentative Writing, Part 2
Content
Students will revise and strengthen a literary analysis essay so the claim about symbolism remains clear throughout the essay.
Language
Students will use precise verbs, commentary phrases, and varied sentence structures to connect evidence to a claim during revision and editing.
What is blood, and how does it work as a symbol of both family ties and our shared humanity?
Knowledge-Building:
Students apply what they have learned about bicultural identity, symbolism, language, loss, and regrowth in “Search for My Tongue” and selected poems from Red, White, and Whole.
Enduring Understanding:
Identity is shaped by biological, cultural, and emotional connections, and symbols help writers express those layered experiences.
Future Lessons:
This lesson sits in SRSD Stages 5–6 as students revise, edit, and move toward more independent literary analysis for the culminating task.
Unit Performance Task:
Revising for clear claim, evidence, and commentary prepares students to write a strong literary analysis of how imagery or symbolism reveals an important connection.
| Lesson Flow | Purpose of Learning Experience |
|---|---|
Launch5 Minutes | Students will review Lesson 17 and set a revision purpose to keep their claim about symbolism visible throughout their argumentative essays. |
Literacy Lab10 Minutes | Students will revise their essays to strengthen evidence sentences and commentary through precise word choice and sentence structure. |
Learning in Action30 Minutes | Part A: Trace the Claim (W.7.5) Students will give one focused round of partner feedback on whether the symbolism claim stays visible throughout the essay. Learning in Action Part B: Revise, Edit, Submit (W.7.5) Students will revise body paragraphs, edit for clarity and correctness, and finalize their essays. |
Not available for this lesson
Not available for this lesson
Material List
Red, White, and Whole by Rajani LaRocca
Student argument drafts (from Lesson 17)
Unit 4 Lesson 18 Student Edition
Routines
Turn-and-Talk
Language Study
Collaborative Revision Protocol
Revision Sprint
Quick Write
Have students take out their drafts from Lesson 17 and place a finger on their claim before speaking.
Say these Directions: In Lesson 17, you wrote a full argument in response to the question: Is symbolism an effective way for a writer to express the experience of living between two cultures? You took a position, selected evidence from Bhatt and LaRocca, and explained how that evidence relates to your claim. Today we are returning to those drafts to check whether your argument holds together from beginning to end.
A claim is a commitment to your reader. It isn’t enough to state it once in your introduction; every paragraph that follows has to keep honoring it. When a claim fades, the writing drifts into summary: retelling what happens in the poem instead of arguing what it means.
Partner A speaks for 30 seconds, then Partner B speaks for 30 seconds.
Ask: Where in your draft does your claim feel most alive right now? Where can you actually feel the argument working, and where does it start to fade into description or summary?
My claim feels strongest in my introduction because I clearly state that symbolism reveals something about living between two cultures that a direct statement would miss. It probably needs more work in my second body paragraph—I introduced the water imagery from “Two” and quoted it, but I moved on without fully connecting it back to my argument about why symbolism is effective.
Students have named where their essays are strongest and where the argument needs more support or clarity, so they are ready to learn one concrete revision move before reading a partner’s draft.
Guide students in strengthening body paragraphs by keeping the claim visible through precise analysis. Support students in revising vague statements into clear sentences that name the symbol, use a strong verb, and explain its significance.
Say these Directions: Today’s revision move is simple: do not let the claim disappear after the introduction. Remember, strong body paragraphs:
Name the symbol
Use a precise verb
Explain what idea the symbol reveals.
We are going to study one weak sentence and one stronger revision so we can see exactly how that move works.
Display page 1 of Red, White, and Whole by LaRocca and direct students to read this excerpt:
Target Sentence:
“I swim in a river of white skin / I float in a sea of brown skin and black hair and dark eyes.” (p. 1)
Display the following weak analysis sentence and revised sentence:
Weak sentence: This image shows Reha is different.
Revised sentence: LaRocca crafts the river and sea as symbols for Reha’s two cultural worlds, making her bicultural identity feel less like a choice between two places and more like two currents she is always moving between.
Chunk | Meaning | Function |
|---|---|---|
LaRocca crafts the river and sea as symbols for Reha’s two cultural worlds, | The poet changes physical details into symbolic images. | keeps the claim focused on symbolism |
making her bicultural identity feel less like a choice between two places and more like two currents she is always moving between. | The symbol feels active, split, and difficult to hold together. | explains why the symbol matters |
Say: When I read the weak sentence, I notice it isn’t exactly wrong, but it’s too vague to carry an argument. Saying Reha is “different” doesn’t remind the reader what the essay is actually claiming about symbolism.
First, I notice that in the revised sentence, I name the symbols directly:river and sea.
Then, I use a precise verb: crafts, to show that this is a deliberate authorial choice.
Next, I add a clause that explains what those symbols do to the idea of bicultural identity.
Say: That explanation is what keeps the claim visible instead of letting the paragraph drift into summary.
Say: As you revise, check that each body paragraph has at least one sentence that does all three things: names the symbol, describes the author’s choice, and explains the significance or effect of that choice.
Check for Understanding (W.7.5) | |
|---|---|
Revise this sentence so the claim about symbolism is visible:
| |
Modeling:If students need support, prompt them to name the symbol first, choose a precise verb like reveals, turns, or conveys, and then explain the idea the symbol communicates. |
Connection to Today’s Learning:
Students now have one clear revision move to carry into partner feedback and independent revision.
Pair students with a partner who can read their draft independently. Students should keep the lens narrow: only read for claim visibility, not for every possible issue.
Say these Directions: Trade drafts with your partner. Read your partner’s essay for one thing only:
Does the claim about symbolism stay visible from the introduction through the body paragraphs and conclusion? OR
Does it disappear or fade in some spots?
As you read, underline one sentence where the claim is clear, put a star beside one place where it fades, and write one specific note before returning the draft.
Use the following feedback stems as you discuss and revise with your partner:
Your claim stays visible when you __________.
The claim fades in paragraph __________ because __________.
A strong next revision would be to __________.
Pulse Check (W.7.5) |
|---|
Which feedback note would help a writer most if the goal is to keep the claim about symbolism visible throughout the essay? A. Add more details in the middle.
B. I liked your essay because it was interesting.
C. In your second body paragraph, you summarize the event, but you stop explaining the role of the symbol. Add a sentence explaining how the growing tongue symbolizes identity returning.
D. Put a better hook in the introduction.
|
Use an example sentence modeled aloud before students return to their own drafts.
Display the following weak sentence and revision:
Weak sentence: In “Search for My Tongue,” the speaker says her tongue grows back, and that means she remembers her language.
Stronger revision: Bhatt turns the tongue into a living plant, so the image symbolizes language and identity growing back even after loss.
Say: I want to show you one revision move that makes an argument hit harder. The weak sentence mostly retells what happens, but it does not sound like an essay about symbolism. In the stronger version, I start with a more precise verb: turns, because that shows the poet is making an intentional craft choice.
I also replace the vague phrase, that means, with the more exact word: symbolizes.
Then I use the phrase: language and identity growing back even after loss so the sentence carries both evidence and commentary instead of stopping at summary.
Say: When you revise today, look for one sentence that only tells what happens and turn it into a sentence that explains what the symbol does in your argument.
Display the following writing model if needed for support and guidance:
One reason symbolism is especially effective in “Two” is that LaRocca makes Reha’s identity feel physical instead of abstract. When Reha says she “swim[s] in a river of white skin” (p. 1) and “float[s] in a sea of brown skin and black hair” (p. 1), the river and sea symbolize the two cultural worlds surrounding her. These are not just descriptions of bodies. The water imagery conveys motion and pressure, which helps readers feel how Reha is constantly carried between identities instead of fully settled in one. Because the symbol stays connected to the idea of bicultural identity, the paragraph keeps the essay’s claim visible from start to finish.
Say these Directions: Revise your argumentative essay in response to the feedback you received from your partner. First, revise at least one body paragraph so the claim about symbolism stays visible through stronger wording or sentence structure. Then edit your full draft using the following checklist:
Display this editing checklist:
I can find my claim about symbolism in every paragraph.
I named the symbol or image directly instead of saying this or it too often.
I introduced evidence by explaining what was happening in the text, not just giving a title.
I revised at least one sentence so that evidence and commentary work together more clearly.
I replaced vague words with precise words like symbolizes, reveals, conveys, intensifies, or regrowth.
I checked grammar and syntax for complete sentences, clear pronouns, and smooth sentence flow.
I checked capitalization, punctuation, and spelling of unit words such as symbolism, identity, bicultural, and commentary.
Lesson 18 Writing Rubric: Literary Analysis Essay — Revise & Strengthen the Claim
Writing prompt: Revise your literary analysis essay so that the claim about symbolism or imagery remains clear and visible throughout all body paragraphs. Strengthen vague commentary, sharpen evidence connections, and edit for clarity and correctness.
Criteria | 1 — Beginning | 2 — Developing | 3 — Proficient |
|---|---|---|---|
Thesis & Claim Visibility (W.7.2.a) Claim Stays Visible Throughout | Revision does not address claim visibility. The claim is still unclear or disappears after the introduction. | The thesis is revised to be clearer, but body paragraphs still lose track of the claim. Not all evidence is connected back to the central argument about imagery or symbolism. | Revision ensures the claim about how a specific image or symbol reveals something meaningful stays visible in every body paragraph. Each paragraph connects its evidence back to the thesis through precise commentary. |
Evidence & Commentary (W.7.2.b) Strengthen Evidence Connections | Vague or paraphrasing commentary remains unchanged in the revision. Evidence is still dropped in without explanation. | Some commentary is strengthened in revision, but not consistently. One or two paragraphs still paraphrase evidence rather than explaining what the image or symbol reveals. | Revision strengthens commentary throughout the essay. Each piece of evidence is introduced with a signal phrase and followed by commentary that explains what the imagery or symbolism reveals — not just what the line says. |
Teacher Feedback Look-Fors |
|---|
Activity: Revision Sprint Instruction: Circulate and provide real-time feedback on student drafts based on the following observable language behaviors: - Target 1 (The Strategy): Students revise using the partner note rather than starting over or making random edits. - Target 2 (Claim Visibility): Students keep the claim about symbolism visible in body paragraphs by naming the symbol and explaining its meaning. - Target 3 (Navigation): Students introduce evidence by connecting to specific parts in the text instead of dropping a quotation with no context. - Target 4 (Precision and Syntax): Students replace vague wording with precise academic verbs and edit sentences for clarity and grammatical control. |
Say: As you revise, check your work for these three things:
Did I keep my claim visible?
Did I explain what the symbols mean?
Did I edit at least one sentence for stronger wording and clearer syntax?
Provide students with a confidence continuum (i.e., 1–5). As needed, model how to demonstrate a level of confidence using the continuum.
Reflection (W.7.5) |
|---|
Use the Reflection routine to reflect on your ability to revise your writing so your claim is clear, your evidence is explained, and your sentences are precise and well-structured. |
Have students reflect on specific revisions and edits they made to their draft.
Say these Directions: Before you turn in your work, take one minute to look back over your draft.
Ask: What are two specific changes you made today, and how did each one strengthen your argument? Include:
one revision that improves your claim about symbolism
one revision that improves grammar, syntax, or word choice
Optional Sentence Starter:
One revision that made my symbolism argument stronger was __________ because __________.
One change I made was in my second body paragraph. At first, I wrote, “This image shows the speaker remembers her language,” but I revised it to: “Bhatt turns the tongue into a growing plant, so the image symbolizes language and identity returning after loss.” This change made my claim about symbolism visible again instead of sounding like a summary. My second change was editing a run-on sentence in my conclusion, so the idea was easier to follow.
Instruct students to reread their final essay and respond to the following prompt in their Journals:
What is the one part of your argument you feel least confident about? Explain your reasoning.
Red, White, and Whole
Rajani LaRocca

“Search for My Tongue”
Sujata Bhatt
